Steward · Record to Report

Hire a digital coworker for every point where a number has to be proved before it is signed

Every other chain finishes its work and hands the result here, where it becomes a figure somebody puts a signature against. Between the two sits a sequence, and each step in it is a place where the truth about the period can arrive late or arrive with nothing behind it. Those points are where the digital coworkers stand, inside the systems you already run.

The close is held together by people chasing it

Every control in this close is real and written down, and each one is performed by whoever still has hours left when the trial balance lands. The calendar does not wait for the person who would have known what to look for.

Top-quartile finance organisations complete the close in roughly half the cycle the bottom quartile needs

APQC General Accounting benchmarking · top quartile against bottom quartile

31%

of organisations are actively using AI in record-to-report processes, with a further 39% in early stages

APQC · share actively using AI in record to report

EUR 750M

Consolidated revenue above which the GloBE rules require a 15% minimum effective tax rate in every jurisdiction

OECD Pillar Two · first GloBE Information Return 30 June 2026

Group 2

Australian entities meeting two of revenue ≥ AUD 200M, assets ≥ AUD 500M or 250 employees lodge AASB S2 climate statements

Corporations Act · from 1 July 2026

Where the pressure shows up

Status by chase

The close plan is broadly right and cannot enforce itself, so the sequence holds only while somebody keeps asking where it is.

Who feels itGroup financial controller · close cycle time

The long tail

High-risk accounts get real attention and the rest get a tick, because there are only so many hours before the deadline.

Who feels itFinancial reporting manager · reconciliation coverage

Both sides right

Two entities disagree about one transaction and neither has erred, so the difference clears when somebody gives way.

Who feels itConsolidation manager · open intercompany difference value

Yesterday's cash

The group position is assembled by hand from bank portals, so a liquidity decision is taken against a picture that has moved.

Who feels itGroup treasurer · cash position latency

The filing set

Hundreds of obligations across entities and jurisdictions live in a spreadsheet and in the head of the person who maintains it.

Who feels itHead of tax · filing timeliness

Assembly time

Most of the reporting window goes on assembling the numbers, so the commentary describes the variance instead of explaining it.

Who feels itHead of FP&A · commentary cycle time

Record to Report turns five other chains into accounts the board can sign

This chain turns what every other chain did into accounts the enterprise can stand behind. Payables from Source to Pay, receivables from Lead to Cash, inventory from Plan to Fulfil, capitalisation from Acquire to Retire and payroll from Hire to Retire all land here, and none of them arrives on the same schedule.

The canonical sequence

The close · entity to group

  1. 01

    Sub-ledgers

    Close and feed

    Held by your team

  2. 02

    Reconcile

    Prove balances

    ROMINA

  3. 03

    Intercompany

    Align and eliminate

    ISABELA

  4. 04

    Close

    Gate and control

    COLIN

  5. 05

    Consolidate

    Aggregate

    Held by your team

  6. 06

    Report

    Explain results

    VERNA

Running alongside · treasury and tax

Two tracks run beside the close and meet it: treasury feeds consolidation, tax feeds the statutory outputs. TALIA holds the cash and TOMAS the obligations.

  1. T1

    Treasury

    Know the cash

    TALIA

  2. T2

    Tax

    Track obligations

    TOMAS

  3. T3

    Statutory outputs

    Assemble the pack

    TOMAS

Who owns this chain today

Enterprise owners
  • Chief Financial Officerthe result the board sees
  • Group financial controllerthe close that produces it
Human roles
  • Financial controllers
  • General ledger accountants
  • Intercompany accountants
  • Treasury analysts
  • Tax accountants
  • FP&A analysts
Upstream inputs
  • Payables from Source to Pay
  • Receivables from Lead to Cash
  • Inventory from Plan to Fulfil
  • Capitalisation from Acquire to Retire
  • Payroll from Hire to Retire
  • Bank and market data
Downstream consumers
  • The board
  • External auditors
  • Regulators and markets
  • Tax authorities
  • Monitor to Comply
  • Management reporting and variance

A digital coworker takes a position on the chart and answers for it

Read down any position on a chart and it tells you who is accountable for it, what its holder may do without asking, and who picks up the call that is not theirs to make. A digital coworker is written up the same way, and the answers do not change because the holder is not a person.

Employee ID PXN‑R2R‑001

COLIN

Close Orchestration, Ledger Integrity Navigator

Position
Close Orchestration
Value chain
Record to Report
Role
Holds the close as one governed sequence, and keeps every gate decision visible to the controller, who opens it.
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Group close · Gate 04 dependencies

2 participants

Gate held

COLIN Close Orchestration

Three entities have not completed their sub-ledger close, so I am holding gate 04 and I have recorded why. Only the break sits on the critical path. The two confirmations clear before consolidation whether or not anyone chases them. I have not opened the period or approved anything.
Entities held
3 of 14
Awaiting confirmation
2 entities
Break above threshold
1 entity
Period
March 2026

COLIN

I propose to open gate 04 for the two entities with confirmations outstanding, keep it shut for the entity with the break, and send the break to the financial reporting manager with its ageing attached. Shall I proceed?

Financial Controller Group finance

Proceed. Take the break to the reporting manager now and keep the gate shut on that entity until it clears.

Seen by COLIN

COLIN Close Orchestration

Gate 04 opened for two entities and held for the third. The break is with the financial reporting manager, with its ageing attached.

Gate decision taken by the Financial Controller. 09:17 · Entities on the critical path 1 of 14

Preparation and approval never end up in the same hands on this chain

The interesting line on each card is the boundary. Nobody here posts the journal they prepared, opens the gate they verified, or authors what they drafted for a board, and that separation is the thing an external auditor spends its year testing.

The sequence

  1. Sub-ledgers
  2. Reconcile
  3. Intercompany
  4. Close
  5. Consolidate
  6. Report

Close Orchestration

COLIN

Close Orchestration, Ledger Integrity Navigator

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-001

Owns
Holds the close as one governed sequence of dependencies, evidence and decisions.
Boundary
Verifies the condition behind a gate. The controller opens it.
Measured on
  • Close cycle time and milestone adherence
  • Gate breaches
  • Controller time chasing status versus performing work
Skills
Maps close task dependenciesReasons over the critical pathVerifies predecessors by conditionTests evidence at each gatePredicts bottlenecks against paceAssembles one close status
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableChief Financial Officer
  2. Owns the workGroup financial controller
  3. Position held byCOLIN
  4. Escalates toController · CFO delegate · Process owners · Statutory reporting

TodayGates are advisory, so a task marked complete moves the close whether or not it is.

With COLIN in the roleA predictable close, with expert attention pointed at the true critical path.

Reconcile

  1. Sub-ledgers
  2. Reconcile
  3. Intercompany
  4. Close
  5. Consolidate
  6. Report

Reconciliation and Journals

ROMINA

Reconciliation, Offset, Matching, Integrity and Notification Advisor

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-002

Owns
Reconciles what can be proven and isolates what cannot.
Boundary
Prepares the journal with its evidence. An accountant reviews and posts it.
Measured on
  • Reconciliation coverage and on-time certification
  • Unreconciled value and break ageing
  • Manual journal volume and root-cause mix
Skills
Tests population completeness firstMatches deterministically, then probabilisticallyClassifies breaks by causeRanks by value, age, riskDetects patterns below materialityPrepares journals with evidence
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableGroup financial controller
  2. Owns the workFinancial reporting manager
  3. Position held byROMINA
  4. Escalates toController · Financial reporting manager · Controls · The owning chain

TodayThe long tail is reconciled by tick, because the hours run out before it does.

With ROMINA in the roleBetter balance assurance with less repetitive reconciliation effort.

Intercompany

  1. Sub-ledgers
  2. Reconcile
  3. Intercompany
  4. Close
  5. Consolidate
  6. Report

Intercompany

ISABELA

Intercompany Settlement, Alignment, Balance, Elimination and Ledger Advisor

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-003

Owns
Resolves the two-sided difference before it becomes a consolidation problem.
Boundary
Assembles the evidence for both sides. The two accountants settle it.
Measured on
  • Matched-by-deadline rate
  • Open difference value and age
  • Bilateral resolution time
Skills
Matches counterparty balances continuouslyAligns partner and timing evidenceClassifies the difference by typeApplies markup and recharge logicPrepares netting and eliminationsAssembles jurisdiction-level positions
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableGroup financial controller
  2. Owns the workConsolidation manager
  3. Position held byISABELA
  4. Escalates toGroup tax · Controller · Master data · Process owners

TodayBoth entities are locally correct, so the difference clears by concession.

With ISABELA in the roleLess mismatch reaching consolidation, and recurring causes made visible.

Treasury

  1. Treasury
  2. Tax
  3. Statutory outputs

Treasury and Cash

TALIA

Treasury Assurance, Liquidity and Insight Advisor

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-004

Owns
Composes a reliable group cash position and makes unusual movement visible.
Boundary
Assembles the position and names the exposure. It never moves money.
Measured on
  • Cash position completeness and latency
  • Bank reconciliation coverage and timeliness
  • Unmatched item ageing
Skills
Matches across banks and entitiesReconciles differing cut-offsClassifies unmatched itemsMonitors liquidity against thresholdReasons over value datesDetects unusual payment instructions
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableChief Financial Officer
  2. Owns the workGroup treasurer
  3. Position held byTALIA
  4. Escalates toTreasurer and CFO · Controls and risk · Compliance

TodayThe position is assembled by hand each morning and is accurate as at yesterday.

With TALIA in the roleBetter liquidity visibility, and risk in cash movement seen before it becomes loss.

Tax and statutory

  1. Treasury
  2. Tax
  3. Statutory outputs

Tax and Statutory

TOMAS

Tax Obligation Monitoring and Assurance Sentinel

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-005

Owns
Assembles the transaction-to-return evidence chain across entities and jurisdictions.
Boundary
Assembles, reconciles and tracks. It never takes a position and never lodges.
Measured on
  • Filing timeliness
  • Transaction-to-return traceability
  • Data readiness lead time before a deadline
Skills
Maintains the obligation registerChecks completeness back to sourceValidates rules by effective dateReconciles tax accounts to ledgerAssembles minimum-tax jurisdictional dataDetects newly in-scope entities
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableChief Financial Officer
  2. Owns the workHead of tax
  3. Position held byTOMAS
  4. Escalates toHead of tax · Chief Financial Officer · External advisers · Group reporting

TodayThe obligation set lives in a spreadsheet and in one person’s memory.

With TOMAS in the roleLess evidence preparation, and every data gap surfaced while there is still runway.

Report

  1. Sub-ledgers
  2. Reconcile
  3. Intercompany
  4. Close
  5. Consolidate
  6. Report

Management Reporting and Variance

VERNA

Variance Explanation, Reporting and Narrative Advisor

Record to Report · PXN-R2R-006

Owns
Turns a governed result into an evidence-backed management story.
Boundary
Drafts the narrative with its evidence. A person authors what a board reads.
Measured on
  • Report production and commentary cycle time
  • Material variance with an evidence-backed explanation
  • Finance effort on analysis versus assembly
Skills
Validates totals before analysingComputes variances against planDecomposes variance into driversTraces variances to sourceDrafts commentary in house styleSeparates fact from hypothesis
Authorised · Logged · Reversible

Work chart

  1. AccountableChief Financial Officer
  2. Owns the workHead of FP&A
  3. Position held byVERNA
  4. Escalates toController · Finance leadership · Controls · Management

TodayThe pack is assembled against a deadline that lands on top of the close.

With VERNA in the roleFinance time moves from compilation to decision support.

Hiring into this chain puts a holder on every gate the close runs through

Six digital coworkers hold posts across this chain, from the sub-ledger that feeds it to the pack that explains the result, and each is measured on one number. How much it moves for you is sized from your own data in the first session.

Six holders on one rail Six glass slabs, one per Record to Report stage, hang from a lit spine. ROMINA, ISABELA, COLIN and VERNA hold four; two stay with your team. 01 Sub-ledgers 02 Reconcile R 03 Intercompany I 04 Close C 05 Consolidate 06 Report V
  • Gates that hold on the condition

    A gate opens because the condition behind it was verified, not because a task was marked complete, and the controller still takes the decision.

    KPIDecreaseClose gate breaches

  • Coverage instead of triage

    Every account in scope is reconciled with its population tested first, rather than the accounts there were hours left for.

    KPIIncreaseReconciliation coverage

  • Mismatch resolved, not adjusted away

    Intercompany differences are diagnosed by cause and the recurring ones attributed, so a topside adjustment stops being the resolution mechanism.

    KPIDecreasePost-close intercompany adjustments

  • Cash that is current when asked

    The group position is composed from bank and ledger feeds as they arrive, with every unmatched item classified, and every movement of funds stays a human decision.

    KPIDecreaseCash position latency

  • Jurisdictional data ready early

    The data a minimum-tax calculation needs is assembled and its gaps named while there is still runway to fill them.

    KPIIncreaseData readiness lead time

  • Commentary that explains

    Variance arrives as an evidenced draft with the unexplained marked as unexplained, so the analyst starts from something rather than a blank page.

    KPIDecreaseCommentary cycle time

The chart says who decides, and it is never the digital coworker

A digital coworker works inside the systems, data, policies and authorisations you already have. It is given the access a person in the same position would be given, and no more. Your auditors test it in the environment they already know.

What the role works inside

  • Enterprise applications

    ERP, sub-ledgers, consolidation, treasury, tax and reporting systems.

  • Master data

    Chart of accounts, entity, intercompany partner, bank and tax records.

  • Policies and controls

    Business rules, thresholds, approval policies and compliance requirements.

  • Authorisations

    Defined permissions for every action performed by the role.

  • Governance

    Security, privacy, service levels, change governance and escalation.

The governance perimeter Three rings around the position: acts alone inside, recommends in the middle, escalates at the edge. Nothing runs outside the outer ring. ESCALATES RECOMMENDS ACTS ALONE THE POSITION

The control model

  1. Acts alone

    Defined actions, inside the authority you set.

  2. Recommends

    Prepares the case and hands the decision up.

  3. Escalates

    Anything outside the authority the role holds.

Start with a number. Prove the result. Build from there

Both sides put a signature on the same page before anything is built, and the ProxyN lead who signs is accountable for it in the way your sponsor is. Nothing in it gets agreed after the result is known.

What gets signed

The Outcome Commitment

Five lines both sides sign before anything is built. Every one is a fact about your operation, not a forecast about ours.

  • KPIWhat needs to move.
  • BaselineWhere performance starts, using operational data.
  • TargetThe agreed level of movement.
  • TimelineWhen the outcome will be assessed.
  • Acceptance testHow achievement will be determined.

What happens after signing

The adoption loop

The order the work runs in, one role at a time. The seventh step is the first step of the next loop.

  1. Set the baseline
  2. Hire the role
  3. Put the role to work
  4. Measure the KPI
  5. Prove the outcome
  6. Address the next bottleneck
  7. Add the next roleBack to the baseline for the next role

What we need from you

  • Twelve months of history from the system of record, read only

  • The written policy and the approval thresholds the role will work inside

  • The accountable person for the number, in the room for the first session

Get started

Stop Buying Platforms.
Start Hiring Outcomes.

Bring one workflow and the person accountable for it. In the first session we map the process, establish the baseline logic and tell you whether there is a number worth signing. If there is not, we will say so.